On the Principle of "Everything" akin to a Theory of Everything, Part Three

I recently posted a extended on an old professor's Facebook page, which is being made available here:

"Hey Tom, with all the recent sensationalism on the "discovery" or detection of gravitational waves, I was wondering should you or anyone who has studied at Cornell feel stupid? I mean...our eyes have been detecting gravitational waves for a really long time...we call them "tides" (ie, the moon's fluctuating gravitational wave on the bodies of water covering the earth's surface), but even with Einstein's genius slip and failure to see the same leaves me questioning, how intelligent are we? Gravitational waves change the distance between objects...where a tide is a change in wave height on a body of water and the distance of shore covered by the sea. Uh...are we really that stupid, as a species, that we had to build such an expensive machine to "detect" gravitational waves, when by that very definition, we've been observing and detecting waves with our very own eyes with tides due to the moon's gravitational rotation around the earth? It's kinda cool too, if you consider that all subatomic particles or waves are not separate entities, but wave-particles, where particle like behavior is observed where compression of the wave occurs, and more wave like behavior in emptier spacetime through which the wave-particle travels. Also, consider this...pinch a torus and you have the observation of a particle, and the displaced spacetime or energymatter converting into additional wave like behavior...this sounds a lot like electron energy fields. All subatomic "particles" are waveparticles that are mathematically explained as the function of a torus...what's a torus, the representation of the path of a circle around a given point. Bound that area, and then "compress" the circle, and some really interesting things are going to be discovered! And at Science.com--http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/02/here-s-first-person-spot-those-gravitational-waves--there's an article on "Here's the first person to detect those gravitational waves." And it took 1000 physicists to work on LIGO, lol. So dead wrong on that one, we've all detected gravitational waves.

LMFAO!!!! I hope the "This doesn't look like science" box appears on this posting, because a lot of "science" was conducted on a natural phenomenon that we just couldn't wrap our minds around. I changed the html programming for the hyperlink simply with double hyphens and bestedSicenceMag.Org's and Facebook's linking system...to me, that's sorta a representation of another black hole...apparently there's some sort of field in astronomy dedicated to mathematical modeling (computer calculation, modeling and animation) of gravitational waves that is very Atari Pong in mental reasoning...uh, the mathematical equations to represent them for 2-D, 3-D, and other dimensional modeling, as well as computer representation are not difficult at all...I've been having my problem wrapping and warping my mind around, lol, but splicing waveparticles as one or the other is a mental roadblock in and of itself. Hope you don't mind my sharing them with you once I work them out. What I know for sure is this: the gravity bounded in the singularity prior to the Big Bang is the summation of all gravity in the Universe; think of it as gravity existing only as a particle in the singularity just prior to the Big Bang and as a wave throughout the rest of spacetime.

Here's a newly published article from Space.com, explaining the exact same thing:

http://www.space.com/32008-five-dimensional-black-holes-theory.html?cmpid=514630_20160223_58577986&adbid=10153324697596466&adbpl=fb&adbpr=17610706465

As I stated in Part One, "Without complicated mathematics nor scientific theorems, designations of chemicals, elements, nor subatomic particles, is a "Principle of Everything," that in time will be scientifically proven..."Here's to saying, "I told you so," while no one is really listening.